Most organizations have a limited view of their workforces in terms of both headcount numbers and costs. While HR typically reports headcount figures, the task of calculating the cost of the workforce is often left to Finance. Unfortunately, many HR groups don’t have the expertise or credibility to report costs and therefore defer to their Finance counterparts. Headcount figures are important, no doubt, but this data alone only tells part of the story. Executives and line managers want to know how much they are spending on talent, and how different decisions will impact these costs. HR, in partnership with Finance, needs to take the initiative to calculate and report these costs. The HR leaders at ConAgra Foods did not shrink away from this challenge. Until recently, ConAgra Foods struggled to collect accurate data about its workforce. Information was spread across the organization in siloed systems and was often difficult to reconcile (sound familiar?) In a relatively short timeframe, however, ConAgra Foods’ HR team has been able to leverage technology solutions to provide both current and projected headcount as well as total workforce costs. To estimate these costs, the analytics team partnered with Finance (a key relationship for HR and analytics teams) to begin mapping all of the available data and processes. The company was using two principle systems: the HRIS, managed by HR, provided data on salary and benefits; and an ERP system, technically owned by Finance, provided cost data.  Neither system held all of the necessary costs or details for accurate planning, forecasting, and analysis.  The goal was to deliver all workforce cost data, regardless of source, to the cloud-based workforce planning system (Visier) to provide a complete picture of costs. To calculate the total cost of the workforce (TCOW), the team developed a visual taxonomy of the different data elements that contribute to this figure (see Figure 1). The four major categories include direct compensation, benefits, employer costs for labor, and workforce overhead. Each of these categories, in turn, has subcategories with specific data elements.  All of these need to be considered when calculating the total cost of workforce. Many times companies only look at payroll or compensation figures, but as this chart shows, that is only part of the total cost. With all of the data in one place, ConAgra Foods’ HR and Finance teams are now able to see the impact of spending at a minute level and understand what impact its workforce costs have on its financial plan. They can also run different scenarios, for example, modeling workforce costs between two different locations, or modeling the cost of entering new markets versus continuing operations as is. In the past, this would have been a highly manual, time-consuming, and error-prone task. If your HR organization is not able to do these types of analyses, it should work to get there. Increasingly business leaders are calling on HR to step up its game in using analytics to make better workforce decisions. Cost is a key component of these decisions. So if you don't have a strong relationship with your CFO, start building that relationship now. Figure 1: Total Cost of Workforce Taxonomy        

Most organizations have a limited view of their workforces in terms of both headcount numbers and costs. While HR typically reports headcount figures, the task of calculating the cost of the workforce is often left to Finance. Unfortunately, many HR groups don’t have the expertise or credibility to report costs and therefore defer to their Finance counterparts. Headcount figures are important, no doubt, but this data alone only tells part of the story. Executives and line managers want to know how much they are spending on talent, and how different decisions will impact these costs. HR, in partnership with Finance, needs to take the initiative to calculate and report these costs. The HR leaders at ConAgra Foods did not shrink away from this challenge. Until recently, ConAgra Foods struggled to collect accurate data about its workforce. Information was spread across the organization in siloed systems and was often difficult to reconcile (sound familiar?) In a relatively short timeframe, however, ConAgra Foods’ HR team has been able to leverage technology solutions to provide both current and projected headcount as well as total workforce costs. To estimate these costs, the analytics team partnered with Finance (a key relationship for HR and analytics teams) to begin mapping all of the available data and processes. The company was using two principle systems: the HRIS, managed by HR, provided data on salary and benefits; and an ERP system, technically owned by Finance, provided cost data.  Neither system held all of the necessary costs or details for accurate planning, forecasting, and analysis.  The goal was to deliver all workforce cost data, regardless of source, to the cloud-based workforce planning system (Visier) to provide a complete picture of costs. To calculate the total cost of the workforce (TCOW), the team developed a visual taxonomy of the different data elements that contribute to this figure (see Figure 1). The four major categories include direct compensation, benefits, employer costs for labor, and workforce overhead. Each of these categories, in turn, has subcategories with specific data elements.  All of these need to be considered when calculating the total cost of workforce. Many times companies only look at payroll or compensation figures, but as this chart shows, that is only part of the total cost. With all of the data in one place, ConAgra Foods’ HR and Finance teams are now able to see the impact of spending at a minute level and understand what impact its workforce costs have on its financial plan. They can also run different scenarios, for example, modeling workforce costs between two different locations, or modeling the cost of entering new markets versus continuing operations as is. In the past, this would have been a highly manual, time-consuming, and error-prone task. If your HR organization is not able to do these types of analyses, it should work to get there. Increasingly business leaders are calling on HR to step up its game in using analytics to make better workforce decisions. Cost is a key component of these decisions. So if you don't have a strong relationship with your CFO, start building that relationship now. Figure 1: Total Cost of Workforce Taxonomy        

One of the things I enjoy the most about being an analyst is the opportunity to speak with Bersin members about the Talent Acquisition issues they’re facing. Last spring, we started getting a lot of questions about campus recruiting programs, e.g., How should we structure our campus recruiting program? Do you have any frameworks, metrics, or other guidance for developing a campus recruiting strategy? What metrics should we use to measure program success?   In response to this member demand, I’m excited to announce that we’re publishing a new research report today, Developing an Effective Campus Recruiting Program, that answers these questions and more.   Why should organizations invest the time and resources in a campus recruiting program? Campus hires can provide organizations with a consistent pool of workers in today’s talent-constrained global business world, with 73 percent of large organizations hiring interns to fill full-time positions.[1] Campus programs boast high retention rates with 69 percent of campus hires remaining with an organization after five years.[2] This is good news, given that employee turnover can be costly.   Campus recruiting can deliver additional strategic benefits by helping organizations manage talent gaps and elevate their profiles as potential employers on campuses. It also can bring fresh and diverse perspectives to the organization on topics ranging from technology to contemporary workplace policies.   To help organizations assess the current state of their campus recruiting programs and identify opportunities to develop a strategic approach, the report outlines six critical steps: ·        Create a compelling business case. Present convincing business reasons for increased investment and commitment to campus programs, such as how they can tap rich talent pools, reduce turnover, and help build leadership pipelines. Presenting a clear vision for your recruiting efforts is critical to creating an effective program. ·        Identify stakeholders and decision-makers. A large number of individuals need to champion, support and ultimately manage program development and implementation. Executive buy-in and support are likely to contribute to the overall success of a campus program. ·        Develop strategy and tactics. A campus recruiting program may satisfy a variety of needs, from traditional internships and cooperative programs to entry-level positions and even experienced hiring. Organizations should align their campus recruiting initiatives with their overall talent acquisition strategy and develop a work plan. ·        Determine a budget. Some campus recruiting programs fail to launch due to lack of financial support from leadership. Set a realistic budget and look for ways to optimize efforts by using niche job posting sites, hosting virtual job fairs, and partnering with local universities. ·        Align resources. As the need to hire more skilled entry-level staff and interns in competitive fields grows, organizations should look to individuals from the business, former interns, and college alumni networks to help align campus strategies and program execution. ·        Ensure sustainability. Delivering a sustainable program requires anticipating emerging business needs and continued identification of the successes and shortcomings of a current campus recruiting program. Assessing ROI and the value of the program will be the truest measure of a program’s success.   Interested in learning more? Download the complimentary WhatWorks® Brief and join Denise Moulton and me for an online webinar, Going Back to School: Developing a More Effective Campus Recruiting Program, on February 24, 2015 2:00 p.m. ET.   As always, feel free to add a comment below, connect with me on Twitter @RAEricksonPhD, or by email at rerickson@deloitte.com                 This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.   [1] Source: "Infographic: Internships Survey and 2014 Internship Trends," Internships.com, January 23, 2014, http://www.internships.com/eyeoftheintern/news/idc-news/internships-survey-2014-internship-trends/ . [2] Source: "2014 Internship & Co-op Survey," National Association of Colleges and Employers, April 2014, http://www.naceweb.org/uploadedFiles/Content/static-assets/downloads/executive-summary/2014-internship-co-op-survey-executive-summary.pdf .  

We are a research organization, and one of the most important thing we do is share information, data, and perspectives. Over the coming weeks there will be a lot of new insights coming, and I want to highlight some important things you can do to help. First, we are in the final stages of producing the Bersin Talent, HR and Learning Predictions for 2015, which will be out soon. I have personally spent countless hours on this research, and it brings together our combined perspectives on the ten biggest imperatives we believe HR and talent professionals should consider in the coming year. I won't give away any secrets, but stay tuned it's coming soon. The second big project I want to highlight is one you can participate in right now: Deloitte's Third Annual Global Human Capital Trends study. This is a massive global project I lead with two other partners, and it represents one of the biggest (if not the biggest) global studies of talent and HR issues around the world. Like last year, we expect to have data from more than 90 different countries and we have already found some dramatic shifts in the issues and capability gaps in HR around the world. Right now we are in the final stages of closing the survey, and we would like your help. Please take the survey here - it will help give you (and your peers) great insights into the global issues we face in 2015, and I greatly look forward to sharing results with you. I am excited to start sharing our perspectives for 2015 in the coming weeks!

Most HR organizations have been slow to adopt analytics - too slow, in fact, in the minds of many impatient business leaders.  Our research conducted last year showed that just 14% of HR organizations in the U.S are using advanced or predictive analytics to make talent decisions. These companies have created strong analytics teams with a diversity of skill sets and have established data governance processes for data quality and integration.   Despite the prognostications that 2014 would be "the year of predictive talent analytics," things haven’t changed all that much. I keep hearing the same questions from HR leaders over and over again: "How do I get started with analytics?" "How do we clean and integrate our data?" "How do we upskill our staff to be more data savvy?" If HR continues to drag its feet, it risks losing control over its data, and its chance to gain some real power within the organization. Witness the articles in support of CFOs owning analytics within corporate America. CFOs understand the value of data and are already using analytics to help them understand and predict margins, pricing models, and potential new revenue streams. For decades Finance has been using analytics to better understand where the business is strong and where it needs improvement. CFOs could be a natural fit to lead analytics across the organization - taking over responsibility for HR analytics, marketing analytics, and operational analytics. Most CFOs are in a position of power within their organizations. They already control much of that data on company financials and operations.  They have credibility and are seen (in many companies) as the source of truth.  They understand data and know how to use it. In many organizations, HR falls short on all of the above. Which is why HR risks losing control of its talent data to CFOs, who may be looking to further expand their leadership roles and spheres of influence throughout the company - and who are tired of waiting for HR leaders to "get it" when it comes to analytics.  I’ve already talked with several companies over the past two months that have centralized their analytics across functions. In a some cases, the CFO is running the analytics organization. In others, it  falls under the COO or CIO.  This should be a wake-up call for HR leaders. The battleground over corporate data is threatening to heat up, and HR can’t throw up the white flag and  lose its stake in the one area that promises to bring it credibility with executives and power over talent and business decisions. If your HR organization is still new to analytics, here is one thing you can do: Find a business leader who is willing to partner on an analytics project to solve a problem (e.g. reducing turnover, improving engagement, reducing accidents/theft/leakage, etc.) Put together a skunks works team, borrowing talent from another department if necessary or partnering with a university or external supplier, and look to get a small ‘win.’  After that, evangelize the results and find another internal stakeholder or two to partner with on another, slightly larger, project. After you have a few small wins and have built some credibility with business leaders, you can ask for some additional resources and start building an analytics team. Many HR people say, "I can’t get the funding for analytics,"  and it's no wonder...since they haven’t proven the value and their credibility yet.  So start small - look for a  supportive business leader with a pain point  - and grow from there. Any don’t wait too long, or before you know it, your CFO may be managing your talent data.  

Competencies are the language of talent management.  They provide guidance to managers and direct reports alike on the behaviors that are expected.  They also are a way to assess those behaviors, whether for the purpose of hiring, development, or performance appraisal.  Yet, for all that can potentially be right about competencies, so much can also potentially be wrong.  In many organizations we talk to, competencies are too numerous, ill-defined, or too complex.  The result is the competencies are infrequently used and ultimately cast aside.  Therefore, we have to ask ourselves, "Are competencies dead?" We are currently in the midst of a new research initiative on this question (and we’d like your help on it - see details below).  Our initial research reveals, no, competencies are not dead - in many organizations they are alive and well, working as intended.  In the organizations that are not using them effectively, though, the competencies seem to be collapsing under their own weight, dying a very slow death.  These organizations have "zombie competencies" - or "zompetencies," if you like.    So, how do leaders keep their organizations from creating zompetencies?  Here are a few suggestions: Design for criticality:  Focus on what is essential to success - not every competency necessary for doing a job.   Design for impact:  Focus on competencies that align to the organization’s business strategy and greatest areas of need.  If your organization is making a major transformation from one focused on execution to one focused on innovation, competencies should be a part of the bedrock of the change effort. Design for simplicity:  Constantly ask yourself if the competencies are necessary or can be expressed more simply.  Further, in an effort to reduce competencies, do not combine two competencies into one.  "Visionary leadership and tactical execution" is not one competency. Design for acceptance:  Avoid the trap of developing competencies in a vacuum.  Competencies need to be broadly socialized and amended as they are developed, to ensure both broad understanding and agreement on their content.  Ultimately, managers and direct reports need to understand the competencies, what they mean, and how to use them - and integrate them into how they talk about talent on a regular basis.  How does your organization keep competencies alive and well?  Or how has it gotten rid of zompetencies in the past?  We are currently looking for examples of effective approaches to competency models and how they support talent management.  Please email me at sgarr@deloitte.com if you have any examples from your or other organizations you can share. Special thanks to Joe Folkman and Candace Atamanik for their contribution to some of the concepts in this blog.

Impressive this year is the software creator’s mantra "develop for mobile first." Our survey of providers indicated that solutions are created and in the market for every area of talent:  learning, rewards, performance management and appraisal approval, succession and hiring management and many more.  Even core HR. Even content authoring tools. There is employee self-service and managerial self-service, and for hourly workers, the ability to clock in and clock out—all on their mobile phones. And the applications available for mobile use in HR vary in both number and sophistication. Oracle offers a company directory, Organization Navigator, predictive analytics, goal management, talent profile, and a personalizable dashboard on mobile devices. SumTotal offers a Smartphone app for every one of the 18 content areas we surveyed.  Close to 70 percent of the providers surveyed have mobile learning management capabilities today. Nine of 48 support the ability to supervise people and take notes on the experience for sharing later. Mobile apps are pretty much everywhere. But are companies actually using them for human capital management?  We decided that would be an interesting question to pursue! What is your company’s stance on HCM apps on Smartphones?  Do you use them today? Will you add mobile apps in the year ahead?  Or do you have no need nor plans to deploy mobile HR apps in the future? Whatever your stance, please let us hear from you!  Take this short survey (just a few minutes, promise!) on use and intended use of human capital related apps on Smartphones by clicking on the link below.     This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. As used in this document, "Deloitte" means Deloitte Consulting LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Copyright © 2014 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.  

How is your week going?  If you are anything like many of the people I have spoken with this week, you are having one of the most productive weeks of the year.  Your focus is like a laser, your to-do list is pared back, and your eyes are on the prize:  to finish up the most critical items before the end of the year.  So, I have to ask you:  why is every week not more like this one? The likely answer is that in other weeks you lack the goal clarity that is helping you focus now.  Our new research, High-Impact Performance Management: Using Goals to Focus the 21st-Century (Not a Bersin member?  Click here for the summary), which we launched yesterday, supports this hypothesis: that many employees lack the clarity they need.  Here are a few findings from the study: Though 76 percent of organizations cascade goals, only 36 percent of organizations have a standard, enterprise-wide approach, which often results in inconsistencies in approach and, potentially, the goals themselves. While more than half (51 percent) of senior leaders convene a series of meetings throughout the year to discuss goals with business leaders, only six percent of team managers /  middle managers receive their goals in the same way, which can result in inconsistent goal messaging.  Though nearly 60 percent of organizations said senior leaders revise their goals during the course of the year, only 36 percent of respondents indicated middle managers make similar revisions to align to new directions being defined by their supervisors.  This can result in the organization’s leaders thinking the company is headed in one direction, but the day-to-day actions of employees taking it in an entirely different one. Our research finds that having that goal clarity - both at the start of the year and on a continuous basis - is a critical factor in predicting business performance.  Specifically, we found that employees with a high level of goal clarity were four times more likely to score in the top quartile of business performance.  Further, organizations that have employees revise or review their goals quarterly or more frequently were three-and-a-half times more likely to score in the top quartile of business performance. This new research summarizes the current state of goal-setting and management, including an overview of common goal-setting practices; a review of the academic debate around goals; our analysis of the challenges of modern goal-setting and management; current trends in goal-setting and revising; and the three key principles and seven related practices that our data indicate are critical to effective goal management (see Figure 1). Figure 1:  Three Principles and Seven Practices for Effective Goal Management Source:  "High-Impact Performance Management: Using Goals to Focus the 21st-Century," Stacia Sherman Garr / Bersin by Deloitte, December 2014. I hope that if you are taking some time off in the coming weeks, that you have an opportunity to unplug and reflect.  When you come back to set your goals - and help your organization set its goals - for 2015, I suggest analyzing your organization’s current goal setting approach and asking yourself: To what extent does your organization’s goal setting process enable you and your employees to have that "end-of-year" clarity on your goals and objectives? To what extent do your organization’s systems, processes, and culture support continued clarity? What can you and your organization do differently to enable greater goal clarity, both in January and throughout the year? If you are able to move the dial on any of these elements, you truly will have given yourself and your employees a gift - the gift of clarity.

My colleague Robin Erickson, Ph.D. and I just completed a webinar called "Get Ready for 2015: Ten Top Actionable Talent Acquisition Trends." In the question and answer period at the end, one of the almost 1,000 registrants asked about the ability to actually apply for a job via a smartphone:  Will it make the recruiter’s job harder or easier? It’s a good question, isn’t it?  Is ease in applying for a job a goal?  If it is really easy, will recruiters just be flooded with junk applications?  Or should the act of applying be laborious enough that only the truly committed apply?  Is it different by industry? By age group? A poll during the webinar showed that over a quarter of participants used mobile in the recruiting process—but we really don’t know how many supported the ability to apply with a mobile phone.  And this moves us to the broader consideration—how do we in human capital management (HCM) plan to use smartphones with not only applicants but also with our existing employees? What is your company’s stance on HCM apps on smartphones?  Do you use them today? Will you add mobile aps in the year ahead?  Please let us hear from you!  Take this short survey (just a few minutes, promise!) on use and intended use of human capital related apps on Smartphones by clicking on the link below. https://bersin.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4Oe9ZKgWotNWEVT&Source=BLG   This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. As used in this document, "Deloitte" means Deloitte Consulting LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Copyright © 2014 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.  

You know you will need to hire new employees in the new year—but are you ready? Will your competition out-engage you in your marketplace? And what will you do if you cannot find the talent you need when you need it?   This afternoon, my colleague Katherine Jones, Ph.D. and I presented a webinar that outlined ten actionable trends that we think will make a difference in talent acquisition (TA) in 2015. If you missed it, you can check out the live tweets at #PFLiveChat and here is a brief recap: Manage Your Employment Brand: Your employment brand reflects your organization and is your strongest asset for attracting new employees and continuously attracting/retaining the high-performers you don’t want to leave. Is your employment brand simply irresistible? And are your employees brand ambassadors for your organization? Craft a Strategic Social Media Campaign: Recruiters need to "go where the puck will be" and understand where candidates are spending their time (pssst: they’re not just on social networks and job boards!). Our recently published High-Impact Talent Acquisition (HITA) industry study found that mature TA functions are five times more likely to have an effective social media campaign.[1] And leading-edge companies have dedicated social media strategists to curate content. Develop a Candidate Experience Strategy: Just like in dating, recruiters should create a good first impression with candidates. Check out my September 28th blog, It’s All About the Candidate Experience, for some suggestions on how to differentiate your organization’s candidate experience. Reimagine the On-Line Application: Unfortunately technology hasn’t kept up as job seekers today are faced with first-generation hiring management systems. Face it: many applicants are searching for jobs on their mobile devices and they’re not going to fill out a 25-page application on their phone. Want to know what’s happening with mobile? Take a short survey and check back in a couple of months for the results. Reinvent Candidate Communications: Ever applied for a job and wondered if your resume went into a black hole? Or worse, applied for a job and received an auto-reject notification within minutes? In a world where we can personalize our M&M’s (yes, I did it for Christmas!) and even our phones know our names, recruiters should be sending personalized content to candidates. Make sure the messages are authentic and representative of your employment brand. Engage Hiring Managers: According to our HITA research, recruiters developing effective relationships with hiring managers is the most influential drive of TA performance outcomes—and a staggering 97% of mature TA functions report that they have strong relationships with hiring managers.[2] And guess what? Developing relationships doesn’t cost your organization much money—just time and mindfulness! Develop Talent Pipelines: Not to be overlooked, developing candidate pools is the second most influential driver of TA performance outcomes.[3] The task of recruiting has moved from the reactive filling of requisitions to proactively courting high-quality talent. Ultimately, with talent pools done well, recruiters can deliver talent on demand. Up the Ante on Onboarding: Did you know that 22% of staff turnover occur in the first 45 days of employment and that 4% of new employees leave after a disastrous first day?[4] Organizations should customize their onboarding programs for various job roles and generational groups, but should include a consistent experience and messaging. In addition, automation is critical to both efficiency and consistency, and some onboarding can be done online before the first day (aka "preboarding). Make Your Metrics Matter: Understanding the importance of metrics and analytics is a significant challenge for the talent acquisition function. With an array of metrics available, organizations should first decide what they want to measure, then determine if they have the technology in place to support the need. The next big thing? Going beyond historical reporting to predictive analytics. Plan for Global TA: Regardless of organizational maturity level, our research found that 68 percent of TA functions were not globally prepared.[5] TA leaders should consider their unique talent landscape—which includes candidate availability and engagement, as well as technology solution and services providers—as they look to take their functions to a global level.   So what else do you think will be important for Talent Acquisition in 2015? Feel free to add a comment below, connect with me on Twitter @RAEricksonPhD, or by email at rerickson@deloitte.com   [1] High-Impact Talent Acquisition, Key Findings and Maturity Model, Robin Erickson, Ph.D., Kim Lamoureux, Denise Moulton / Bersin by Deloitte, September 2014. [2] Ibid. [3] Ibid. [4] Help New Hires Succeed: Beat the Statistics, SHRM Presentation by The Wynhurst Group, April 2007, www.masteryworks.com.; Egon Zehnder International, 2007, as quoted in http://selectmetrix.com/ blogs/category/onramping/. [5] High-Impact Talent Acquisition, Key Findings and Maturity Model, Robin Erickson, Ph.D., Kim Lamoureux, Denise Moulton / Bersin by Deloitte, September 2014.       This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor.   Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.